848 Bussi Aikataulut

https://www.legalcell.org › shanti-devi-v-jagan-devi.html
Article 59 pertains to suits to cancel or set aside an instrument or decree or for the rescission of a contract with a

https://www.urlawyers.in › blog › supreme-court-rules-on-limitation-for...
The Supreme Court of India held in Shanti Devi v Jagan Devi that when a sale deed is void ab initio due to fraud or

https://indianlawlive.net
In Shanti Devi v Jagan Devi 2025 INSC 1105 on 12 September 2025 made it clear when a deed is fraudulent or a

https://api.sci.gov.in › supremecourt
Sale how made Such transfer in the case of tangible immovable property of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards or in

https://www.pslchambers.com › wp-content › uploads › Shanti-D…
In State of Maharashtra vs Pravin Jethalal Kamdar 2000 SCC Online SC 522 it was held that in case of void and non est

https://www.livelaw.in › pdf_upload
It is Article 59 and not Article 65 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act 1963 which would apply to the case in hand However

https://www.casemine.com › commentary › in › void-sale-deeds-and-limitatio…
Mutation presumption Revenue entries mutation do not validate a void transaction nor alter the limitation analysis

https://www.verdictum.in › court-updates › supreme-court
However insofar as the issue of limitation was concerned the High Court differed and came to the conclusion that it

https://www.casemine.com › judgement › in
On appeal the First Appellate Court Civil Appeal No 149 1991 reversed that decision on 07 10 1996 decreeing the